
|
|

Sept. 8, 2006
Rally is counterproductive
NECHEMIA MEYERS
It was a very moving occasion last week when more than 60,000 people
gathered in Tel-Avi's Rabin Square to demand the release of three
Israeli soldiers being held hostage by Hamas and Hezbollah.
A profusion of flags was held aloft, nostalgic songs were sung by
some of Israel's best-known performers and heart-rending speeches
were given by the parents of the hostages. Their theme was clear:
the government that had sent their sons into battle must do whatever
is required to bring them home safe and sound.
I sympathize with the parents, but I didn't attend the rally, because
I regarded it as counterproductive. Its only result is to raise
the bargaining power of the terrorists. Such rallies encourage Hamas
and Hezbollah to demand that even more imprisoned killers be set
free in return for the release of our three soldiers.
The dilemma facing Israeli leaders is not a new one. Time and again,
hundreds of terrorists have been traded for a few soldiers and,
in one instance, for three corpses. Moreover, many of those released
once again kill Israelis.
Even if the government wanted to introduce a no compromise policy
as regards lopsided exchanges, it wouldn't be able to do so because
of public pressure, which, in turn, stems from a very different
attitude towards human life. This is particularly evident when someone
is killed on either side. If the person is an Israeli, our TV stations
give us extremely emotional interviews with the family of the deceased
and extensive footage of his funeral.
In contrast, the Arab families, particularly those in the Gaza Strip
or the West Bank whose children became suicide bombers, will be
shown celebrating the deed of the shaheed (martyr), and often
his mother will express the hope that her other children will follow
in his or her footsteps.
There is probably nothing that can be done to change the cultural
mores of the respective peoples. This would not make much difference
if peace were to come. But the conflict is far from being over,
as we were reminded this week at the beginning of the new school
year.
It was to be initiated, said the Ministry of Education, with a visit
to the shelters in the schoolyard. Some principals objected and
the ministry finally agreed that the visit could be postponed from
the first day of school to later in the first week. But it must
take place.
Does this mean that Israeli children must turn their attention to
protecting themselves from a rocket attack before they can concentrate
on reading, writing and arithmetic? Apparently so, and what applies
to Israeli children certainly applies to Israeli adults as well.
They must clearly be prepared to live in a tough neighborhood, where
humanitarian values and concern for human life are seen as a sign
of weakness that can be exploited by those whose main desire is
to wipe Israel off the map.
Nechemia Meyers is a freelance writer living in Rehovot,
Israel.
^TOP
|
|